FBS-CFB Game Preview: Akron Zips (0-2) vs. UAB Blazers (1-1)

0
35

Venue & Game Details

Kickoff: 8:30 PM ET / 7:30 PM CT

Venue: Protective Stadium, Birmingham, Alabama

Surface: FieldTurf

Broadcast: ESPN+ (Mark Followill & Anthony Herron)

Radio: Akron Sports Network / UAB Blazers Radio Network

Weather Forecast (Kickoff)

Conditions: Mostly clear skies

Temperature: ~82°F (28°C) at kickoff, cooling to ~75°F by the fourth quarter

Humidity: ~64%

Wind: Light SSE breeze at 4–6 mph

Impact: Warm, humid evening — no precipitation expected; ideal for offensive execution.

Injury Report

Akron Zips (per latest injury updates)

RB C. Gee — Questionable (undisclosed)

TE J. Newell — Questionable (undisclosed)

OG N. Stopiak — Questionable (undisclosed)

OG D. Shor — Questionable (undisclosed)

RB T. Curry — Questionable (undisclosed)

K A. Samaha — Questionable (undisclosed)

DL E. Davis — Questionable (undisclosed)

WR P. Davis — Questionable (undisclosed)

S D. David — Questionable (undisclosed)

UAB Blazers

No significant injuries reported.

Recent Form

Akron Zips

L 0–68 @ Nebraska — Offense managed just 146 total yards; QB Ben Finley 7/21, 54 yds.

L 0–10 vs. Wyoming — Defense held Cowboys to 10 points but offense shut out.

UAB Blazers

L 24–38 @ Navy — QB Jalen Kitna 304 pass yds, 2 TD, 2 INT; WR Corri Milliner 100 rec yds, 1 TD.

W 52–42 vs. Alabama State — RB Jevon Jackson 166 rush yds, 2 TD; offense piled up 500+ yards.

Series History

All-time: UAB leads 1–0.

Last meeting: 2019 — UAB 31, Akron 20 (in Akron).

Note: First meeting in Birmingham.

Key Player Matchups

QB Jalen Kitna (UAB) vs. Akron Secondary — Kitna completing 72.7% with 551 yds, 4 TD, 2 INT; Akron allowing 158 pass YPG but untested by elite passing attacks.

RB Jevon Jackson (UAB) vs. Akron Front Seven — Jackson averaging 116 rush YPG at 7.3 YPC; Akron allowing 139 rush YPG but facing its toughest RB yet.

WR Corri Milliner (UAB) vs. CB Elijah Reed (Akron) — Milliner’s 198 rec yds, 2 TD make him Kitna’s go-to deep threat.

QB Ben Finley (Akron) vs. UAB Pass Rush — Finley at 39% completions, 193 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT; UAB defense yet to record an INT in 2025.

RB Sean Patrick (Akron) vs. UAB LB Devin Hightower — Patrick averaging 5.3 YPC; Hightower leads UAB with 16 tackles.

Betting Trends & Angles

UAB: 1-1 ATS in 2025; 0-1 ATS as double-digit favorite; both games Over the total.

Akron: 0-2 ATS; 0-1 ATS as double-digit underdog; 1-1 O/U.

Totals: UAB games averaging 77 total points; Akron games averaging 58.5 total points.

Situational: Akron has been shut out in both games this season; UAB averaging 466.5 total yards per game.

Game Odds

Akron Zips          57.5

UAB Blazers       – 11.5

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odd Direct as of Wednesday, September 12, 2025

Previous articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: Duke Blue Devils (1-1) vs. Tulane Green Wave (2-0)
Next articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: Pittsburgh Panthers (2-0) vs. West Virginia Mountaineers (1-1)
NCAAFB Editor
Profile: A dedicated college football analyst with a deep understanding of the sport’s tactical complexity, recruiting landscape, and conference‑wide dynamics. This columnist provides comprehensive coverage of the NCAA football season, blending film study, statistical insight, and historical context to explain how programs evolve from Week 1 through bowl season and the College Football Playoff. Background: With extensive experience covering Division I football, the columnist has contributed to national sports outlets, digital platforms, and radio segments focused on coaching trends, roster construction, and player development. A background in sports journalism and analytics supports a disciplined approach to evaluating performance, interpreting data, and tracking long‑term program trajectories across all major conferences. Signature Coverage Areas: Game previews and tactical matchups Film‑based breakdowns of offensive and defensive systems Recruiting analysis, transfer‑portal movement, and roster‑building strategy Coaching philosophies, scheme evolution, and conference‑wide trends Historical context, rivalry features, and postseason analysis Style & Approach: The writing emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and accessibility — translating complex schemes, advanced metrics, and recruiting data into insights that resonate with both long‑time college football fans and new followers of the sport. Each column reflects a commitment to balanced reporting, thoughtful evaluation, and a deep appreciation for the tradition, passion, and unpredictability that define NCAA football.