FBS-CFB Game Preview: UAB Blazers (2-1) vs. #15 Tennessee Volunteers (2-1)

0
51

Kickoff: 12:45 PM ET
Venue: Neyland Stadium, Knoxville, Tennessee
Broadcast: SEC Network

Weather Forecast (Knoxville, TN)

Temperature: ~79°F (26°C) at kickoff

Conditions: Mostly sunny, light humidity, winds 5–7 mph

Impact: Excellent football weather; no disruptions expected for passing or kicking.

Injury Report

UAB Blazers (American Athletic Conference):

QB Jalen Kitna (892 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT through three games) healthy and starting.

RB Jevon Jackson (277 rushing yards, 3 TDs) available.

WR Iverson Hooks (84 yards vs. Akron) healthy.

No major defensive absences reported.

#15 Tennessee Volunteers (SEC):

QB Joey Aguilar (906 yards, 9 TD, 2 INT; plus 1 rushing TD) healthy and leading the offense.

RB Star Thomas (221 yards, 3 TDs) available.

WR Chris Brazzell II (364 yards, 5 TDs) and WR Braylon Staley (231 yards, 2 TDs) both active.

Defense intact, led by LB Arion Carter (24 tackles, 2 TFL, 1 sack).

Key Player Matchups

QB Jalen Kitna (UAB) vs. Tennessee Secondary

Kitna has been productive but turnover-prone; Tennessee’s DBs will look to capitalize.

RB Jevon Jackson (UAB) vs. Tennessee Front Seven

Jackson is UAB’s most reliable weapon; Volunteers’ linebackers must contain him.

QB Joey Aguilar (Tennessee) vs. UAB Pass Rush

Aguilar has been efficient and explosive; UAB must pressure him to avoid a shootout.

WR Chris Brazzell II (Tennessee) vs. UAB Corners

Brazzell is averaging 121 yards per game; UAB must prevent deep strikes.

Recent Team Form

UAB Blazers (2–1, AAC)

8/30/25: W 34–17 vs. FCS opponent

9/6/25: L 48–14 @ Mercer

9/13/25: W 31–28 vs. Akron

Trend: Offense improving under Kitna, but defense vulnerable against Power Five speed.

#15 Tennessee Volunteers (2–1, SEC)

8/30/25: W 38–17 vs. FCS opponent

9/6/25: W 41–20 vs. NC State

9/13/25: L 44–41 (OT) vs. Georgia

Trend: Offense explosive (averaging 40+ PPG), defense tested against elite competition.

Series History

Tennessee leads the all-time series 2–0.

Last meeting: 2019, Tennessee defeated UAB 30–7 in Knoxville.

UAB has never beaten Tennessee.

Betting Trends

Tennessee:

3–0 ATS in 2025.

Overs hit in all 3 games.

1–0 ATS as a 39.5+ point favorite this season.

UAB:

1–2 ATS in 2025.

Overs hit in all 3 games.

0–1 SU as a moneyline underdog.

Head-to-Head:

Tennessee 2–0 SU vs. UAB.

UAB has never covered against Tennessee.

Historical Betting Results

Tennessee: Reliable ATS early in 2025, covering large spreads.

UAB: Historically struggles ATS vs. SEC opponents; often competitive early but fades late.

SEC vs. AAC: SEC teams cover ~65% of the time in these matchups.

Game Odds

UAB Blazers                                       69.5

Tennessee Volunteers                   – 40

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odd Direct as of Friday, September 19, 2025

Previous articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: #24 Auburn Tigers (3-0) vs. #13 Oklahoma Sooners (3-0)
Next articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: Tulane Green Wave (3-0) vs. #17 Mississippi Rebels (3-0)
NCAAFB Editor
Profile: A dedicated college football analyst with a deep understanding of the sport’s tactical complexity, recruiting landscape, and conference‑wide dynamics. This columnist provides comprehensive coverage of the NCAA football season, blending film study, statistical insight, and historical context to explain how programs evolve from Week 1 through bowl season and the College Football Playoff. Background: With extensive experience covering Division I football, the columnist has contributed to national sports outlets, digital platforms, and radio segments focused on coaching trends, roster construction, and player development. A background in sports journalism and analytics supports a disciplined approach to evaluating performance, interpreting data, and tracking long‑term program trajectories across all major conferences. Signature Coverage Areas: Game previews and tactical matchups Film‑based breakdowns of offensive and defensive systems Recruiting analysis, transfer‑portal movement, and roster‑building strategy Coaching philosophies, scheme evolution, and conference‑wide trends Historical context, rivalry features, and postseason analysis Style & Approach: The writing emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and accessibility — translating complex schemes, advanced metrics, and recruiting data into insights that resonate with both long‑time college football fans and new followers of the sport. Each column reflects a commitment to balanced reporting, thoughtful evaluation, and a deep appreciation for the tradition, passion, and unpredictability that define NCAA football.