FBS-CFB Game Preview: Lindenwood Lions (2-2) vs. Miami (OH) Redhawks (0-3)

0
46

Venue, Date & Time

Location: Fred C. Yager Stadium, Oxford, Ohio (Capacity: 24,286)

Kickoff: 3:30 PM ET

Broadcast: ESPN+

Weather Forecast (Oxford, OH)

Conditions: Clear skies, mild

Temperature: ~76°F (24°C) at kickoff

Wind: W at 5–7 mph

Impact: Ideal football weather, minimal effect on passing/kicking

Injury Report

Lindenwood Lions

No significant injuries reported

Miami (OH) RedHawks

QB Dequan Finn – Questionable (undisclosed)

WR Kam Perry – Questionable (undisclosed)

Key Player Matchups

QB Noah Glantz (Lindenwood, 1,030 yds, 5 TD, 2 INT) vs. QB Dequan Finn (Miami, 465 yds, 2 TD, 4 INT)

Glantz has been efficient; Finn’s status is uncertain, and turnovers have plagued Miami.

RB Jared Rhodes (Lindenwood, 196 yds, 2 TD) vs. RB Keyon Tracy (Miami, 132 yds)

Rhodes provides balance for Lindenwood; Tracy is Miami’s top rusher.

WR R. Bond (Lindenwood, 301 yds, 4 TD) vs. WR Kam Perry (Miami, 230 yds)

Bond is Glantz’s go-to target; Perry’s availability is key for Miami’s passing game.

LB J. Waller (Miami, 39 tackles) vs. RB Rhodes (Lindenwood)

Waller leads Miami’s defense; must contain Lindenwood’s ground attack.

Recent Team Forms

Lindenwood Lions (2-2)

W 30–27 vs. Stony Brook

W 35–28 @ Charleston Southern

L 13–20 @ Appalachian State

L 13–35 @ St. Thomas

Trend: Offense averaging 22.8 PPG; defense allowing 25.5 PPG.

Miami (OH) RedHawks (0-3)

L 38–41 vs. UNLV

L 17–45 @ Rutgers

L 0–17 @ Wisconsin

Trend: Winless, averaging just 18.3 PPG while allowing 34.3 PPG.

Conference Context

Lindenwood: FCS program (transitioning in OVC/Big South)

Miami (OH): FBS program, Mid-American Conference (MAC)

Note: This is a rare FCS vs. MAC matchup; Lindenwood looking for a statement win, Miami desperate to avoid 0–4.

Series History

First-ever meeting between Lindenwood and Miami (OH)

Betting Trends

Lindenwood:

3–1 ATS in 2025

1–3 O/U this season

Covered as +31.5 underdog vs. App State (lost 20–13).

Miami (OH):

1–2 ATS in 2025

2–1 O/U this season

0–3 SU, struggling to finish games.

Historical Betting Results

Lindenwood 2025:

+3.5 vs. Stony Brook → Covered, won 30–27 (Under 57.5)

-2.5 @ Charleston Southern → Covered, won 35–28 (Over 47.5)

+31.5 @ Appalachian State → Covered, lost 20–13 (Under 56.5)

-6.5 @ St. Thomas → Failed to cover, lost 35–13 (Under 50.5)

Miami (OH) 2025:

+1.5 vs. UNLV → Failed to cover, lost 41–38 (Over 49.5)

+14.5 @ Rutgers → Failed to cover, lost 45–17 (Over 45)

+18.5 @ Wisconsin → Covered, lost 17–0 (Under 41)

Game Odds

Lindenwood Lions                           49.5

Miami (OH) Redhawks                  – 20.5

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odd Direct as of Friday, September 26, 2025

Previous articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: San Diego St. Aztecs (2-1) vs. Northern Illinois Huskies (1-2)
Next articleFBS-CFB Game Preview: Baylor Bears (2-2) vs. Oklahoma St. Cowboys (1-2)
NCAAFB Editor
Profile: A dedicated college football analyst with a deep understanding of the sport’s tactical complexity, recruiting landscape, and conference‑wide dynamics. This columnist provides comprehensive coverage of the NCAA football season, blending film study, statistical insight, and historical context to explain how programs evolve from Week 1 through bowl season and the College Football Playoff. Background: With extensive experience covering Division I football, the columnist has contributed to national sports outlets, digital platforms, and radio segments focused on coaching trends, roster construction, and player development. A background in sports journalism and analytics supports a disciplined approach to evaluating performance, interpreting data, and tracking long‑term program trajectories across all major conferences. Signature Coverage Areas: Game previews and tactical matchups Film‑based breakdowns of offensive and defensive systems Recruiting analysis, transfer‑portal movement, and roster‑building strategy Coaching philosophies, scheme evolution, and conference‑wide trends Historical context, rivalry features, and postseason analysis Style & Approach: The writing emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and accessibility — translating complex schemes, advanced metrics, and recruiting data into insights that resonate with both long‑time college football fans and new followers of the sport. Each column reflects a commitment to balanced reporting, thoughtful evaluation, and a deep appreciation for the tradition, passion, and unpredictability that define NCAA football.