NRG Stadium, Houston, Texas

Venue

NRG Stadium — Houston, TX

• Capacity: ~72,000 (expanded for FIFA)
• Surface: Natural grass (World Cup overlay)
• Roof: Expected closed due to heat and humidity
• Tactical impact: Indoor conditions create a fast, controlled pitch — ideal for Australia’s direct transitions and Paraguay’s structured buildup

Kickoff: 3:00 PM CDT / 1:00 PM PDT

Weather Forecast (Houston, TX)

Even with the roof closed, outside conditions influence humidity inside the stadium.

• Temperature: 93°F (34°C)
• Humidity: 70%
• Wind: 9 mph SE
• Precipitation: 25% chance
• Impact: High humidity favors deeper squads; Australia’s fitness edge could matter late

Injury Report

Paraguay

• Miguel Almirón (RW/AM) — Probable, recovering from minor hamstring tightness
• Gustavo Gómez (CB) — Questionable, knee soreness
• Óscar Romero (AM) — Out, calf strain
• Fabián Balbuena (CB) — Probable, illness recovery Impact: Center‑back depth is shaky; Almirón’s availability is crucial for Paraguay’s counterattacking threat.

Australia

• Mathew Leckie (LW/RW) — Probable, managing workload
• Harry Souttar (CB) — Questionable, ankle swelling
• Ajdin Hrustic (CM) — Out, long‑term foot injury
• Jackson Irvine (CM) — Probable, minor groin issue Impact: Souttar’s status affects Australia’s aerial dominance; midfield creativity takes a hit without Hrustic.

Team Records & Tournament Context

Paraguay

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 1–0–0
• Goals For: 2
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #41
• Identity: Compact 4‑2‑3‑1, strong defensive shape, relies on Almirón for vertical bursts

Australia

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 0
• Goals Against: 2
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #24
• Identity: High‑work‑rate 4‑3‑3, direct transitions, heavy emphasis on wide play and aerial duels

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Paraguay

• W 2–1 vs Turkey
• D 1–1 vs Australia (friendly)
• L 0–1 vs Uruguay
• W 2–0 vs Bolivia
• D 0–0 vs Peru Trend: Defense improving; attack inconsistent but efficient in transition.

Australia

• L 0–2 vs United States
• L 1–3 vs Japan
• W 2–1 vs UAE
• D 1–1 vs South Korea
• W 1–0 vs New Zealand Trend: Struggling against top‑tier opponents; defense vulnerable to pace.

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Miguel Almirón vs. Aziz Behich (Right‑Side Duel)

• Almirón’s pace and diagonal runs are Paraguay’s biggest weapon
• Behich can be exposed by speed Advantage: Paraguay

2. Paraguay’s CBs vs. Australia’s Aerial Threat

• Souttar (if fit) is a major set‑piece weapon
• Paraguay’s CB injuries could be decisive Advantage: Australia (if Souttar plays)

3. Midfield Battle: Cubas & Villasanti vs. Mooy & Irvine

• Paraguay’s double pivot is more defensive and compact
• Australia’s midfield is more physical but less technical Advantage: Even

4. Wide Channels

• Australia relies heavily on Leckie and Boyle
• Paraguay’s fullbacks are disciplined but not fast Advantage: Australia (slightly)

5. Goalkeeper Battle

• Antony Silva (PAR) — Experienced, strong shot‑stopper
• Mat Ryan (AUS) — Commanding presence, excellent distribution Advantage: Australia

Series History

• All‑time meetings: 3
• Paraguay wins: 1
• Australia wins: 1
• Draws: 1
• Last meeting: 0–0 (Friendly, 2010)
• First competitive meeting between the nations

Betting Trends

Paraguay

• 8 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 of last 8: Scored first
• 7 of last 10: Held opponent under 1.0 xG

Australia

• 7 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 5 of last 7: Conceded first
• 6 of last 8: Failed to score multiple goals

MATCH ODDS

Paraguay                             + 180

Australia                              + 310

Draw                                     + 125

Over 1.5 – 155                   Under 1.5 + 125

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Levi’s Stadium, Santa Clara, California

Venue

Levi’s Stadium — Santa Clara, CA

• Capacity: ~71,000 (expanded for FIFA)
• Surface: Natural grass
• Known for: Fast pitch, dry surface, and swirling Bay Area winds that can influence long‑range passing
• Tactical impact: Favors teams with pace and verticality — both nations fit that profile, but the U.S. benefits more from familiarity with West Coast conditions

Kickoff: 6:00 PM PDT / 9:00 PM EDT

Weather Forecast (Santa Clara, CA)

• Temperature: 77°F (25°C)
• Humidity: 48%
• Wind: 13 mph NW
• Precipitation: 0% chance
• Impact: Ideal conditions for high‑tempo football; wind may slightly disrupt Turkey’s long diagonals

Injury Report

Turkey

• Hakan Çalhanoğlu (CM) — Probable, managing minor calf tightness
• Cengiz Ünder (RW) — Questionable, ankle sprain
• Merih Demiral (CB) — Probable, recovering from illness
• Zeki Çelik (RB) — Out, hamstring tear Impact: Right‑side defensive depth is thin; Çalhanoğlu’s availability is essential for tempo control.

United States

• Christian Pulisic (LW) — Probable, recovering from a minor quad issue
• Tyler Adams (DM) — Questionable, lingering back tightness
• Tim Weah (RW) — Probable, recovering from illness
• Chris Richards (CB) — Out, knee ligament injury Impact: Adams’ status is the biggest variable; without him, the U.S. loses its midfield anchor.

Team Records & Tournament Context

Turkey

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 1
• Goals Against: 2
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #36
• Identity: Structured 4‑2‑3‑1, heavy reliance on Çalhanoğlu for progression, dangerous on counters

United States

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 1–0–0
• Goals For: 2
• Goals Against: 0
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #11
• Identity: High‑pressing, athletic, vertical transitions, strong wing play

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Turkey

• L 1–2 vs Paraguay
• D 1–1 vs Australia
• W 2–0 vs Georgia
• L 0–1 vs Portugal
• D 2–2 vs Czech Republic Trend: Inconsistent; defensive lapses in wide areas remain a concern.

United States

• W 2–0 vs Australia
• W 3–1 vs Canada
• D 1–1 vs Colombia
• L 0–2 vs Brazil
• W 2–1 vs Mexico Trend: Strong form; attack clicking, defense improving despite injuries.

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Hakan Çalhanoğlu vs. Weston McKennie

• Çalhanoğlu dictates Turkey’s tempo
• McKennie’s physicality and pressing can disrupt his rhythm Advantage: Even (depends on Adams’ availability)

2. Turkey’s Right Side vs. Pulisic

• With Zeki Çelik out, Turkey’s right flank is vulnerable
• Pulisic thrives in isolation and diagonal dribbles Advantage: United States

3. Yunus Musah vs. Orkun Kökçü

• High‑energy duel between two dynamic midfielders
• Musah’s ball‑carrying vs. Kökçü’s creativity Advantage: United States (slightly)

4. Set Pieces

• Turkey: Strong aerial presence (Demiral, Söyüncü)
• U.S.: Excellent delivery from Pulisic and Reyna Advantage: Even

5. Striker Battle: Burak Yılmaz vs. Folarin Balogun

• Yılmaz: Experience, hold‑up play
• Balogun: Pace, pressing, movement behind the line Advantage: United States

Series History

• All‑time meetings: 6
• Turkey wins: 3
• United States wins: 2
• Draws: 1
• Last meeting: USA 2–1 Turkey (Friendly, 2014)
• First competitive meeting in a FIFA World Cup

Betting Trends

Turkey

• 7 of last 10: Both Teams to Score
• 6 of last 8: Conceded first
• 5 of last 7: Over 2.5

United States

• 8 of last 10: Scored first
• 7 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 of last 8: Won xG battle

MATCH ODDS

Turkey                                  + 260

United States                    – 110

Draw                                     + 310

Over 2.5 – 140                   Under 2.5 + 115

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, Massachusetts

Venue

Gillette Stadium — Foxborough, MA

• Capacity: ~68,000 (expanded for FIFA)
• Surface: Natural grass overlay
• Known for: Wide pitch dimensions, excellent drainage, and swirling winds that can affect long balls
• Tactical impact: Slightly favors possession‑oriented teams like the Netherlands; Tunisia benefits from compact defensive shape

Kickoff: 6:00 PM EDT / 3:00 PM PDT

Weather Forecast (Foxborough, MA)

• Temperature: 78°F (26°C)
• Humidity: 54%
• Wind: 12 mph WNW
• Precipitation: 10% chance
• Impact: Breezy conditions may disrupt aerial distribution; favors teams with ground‑based buildup (Netherlands)

Injury Report

Tunisia

• Ellyes Skhiri (DM) — Probable, recovering from thigh tightness
• Youssef Msakni (LW) — Questionable, knee soreness
• Montassar Talbi (CB) — Probable, minor ankle issue
• Ali Maâloul (LB) — Out, hamstring tear Impact: Tunisia’s left side is weakened; Msakni’s availability is crucial for chance creation.

Netherlands

• Virgil van Dijk (CB) — Probable, managing workload
• Memphis Depay (F) — Questionable, groin discomfort
• Frenkie de Jong (CM) — Out, long‑term ankle injury
• Denzel Dumfries (RWB) — Probable, recovering from illness Impact: De Jong’s absence affects tempo control; Depay’s status influences attacking fluidity.

Team Records & Tournament Context

Tunisia

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 0
• Goals Against: 2
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #29
• Identity: Compact 4‑3‑3/4‑5‑1, disciplined defensive block, counter‑attacking reliance

Netherlands

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 1–0–0
• Goals For: 2
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #7
• Identity: Possession‑dominant, wing‑back driven, fluid attacking rotations

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Tunisia

• L 0–2 vs Japan
• D 1–1 vs Algeria
• W 2–0 vs Mauritania
• L 0–1 vs Egypt
• D 0–0 vs South Africa Trend: Strong defensive structure but major scoring issues.

Netherlands

• W 2–1 vs Sweden
• W 1–0 vs Germany
• D 1–1 vs Scotland
• L 0–2 vs France
• W 3–0 vs Canada Trend: Defense trending upward; attack inconsistent but dangerous in spurts.

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Tunisia’s Low Block vs. Netherlands’ Possession

• Tunisia excels at compactness and denying central lanes
• Netherlands relies on width and overloads Advantage: Netherlands (but patience required)

2. Cody Gakpo vs. Mohamed Dräger (Right Side)

• Gakpo’s inside‑cutting runs are a major threat
• Dräger can be exposed by pace and diagonal movement Advantage: Netherlands

3. Aïssa Laïdouni vs. Tijjani Reijnders (Midfield Engine)

• Laïdouni’s ball‑winning vs. Reijnders’ progressive passing
• Tunisia must disrupt rhythm to stay competitive Advantage: Netherlands (slightly)

4. Set Pieces

• Tunisia: Historically strong in aerial duels
• Netherlands: Elite delivery from Koopmeiners Advantage: Even

5. Goalkeeper Battle

• Aymen Dahmen (TUN) — Excellent reflexes, struggles with crosses
• Bart Verbruggen (NED) — Strong distribution, confident in high line Advantage: Netherlands

Series History

• All‑time meetings: 3
• Netherlands wins: 2
• Tunisia wins: 0
• Draws: 1
• Last meeting: Netherlands 3–1 Tunisia (Friendly, 2018)
• First competitive meeting since 1978 World Cup (1–1 draw)

Betting Trends

Tunisia

• 8 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 of last 8: Failed to score
• 7 straight matches: First‑half under 1.5

Netherlands

• 7 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 of last 8: Scored first
• 5 of last 7: Won xG battle

MATCH ODDS

Tunisia                                 + 2500

Netherlands                       – 1100

Draw                                     + 1000

Over 3.5 + 105                  Under 3.5 – 130

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City, Missouri

Venue

Arrowhead Stadium — Kansas City, MO

• Capacity: ~76,000 (expanded for FIFA)
• Surface: Natural grass overlay
• Known for: One of the loudest stadiums in North America; atmosphere can disrupt communication
• Pitch profile: Slightly slower roll due to humidity; benefits compact, organized teams like Japan

Kickoff: 8:00 PM CDT / 6:00 PM PDT

Weather Forecast (Kansas City, MO)

• Temperature: 84°F (29°C)
• Humidity: 58%
• Wind: 10 mph SSW
• Precipitation: 15% chance
• Impact: Mild humidity favors Japan’s high‑tempo passing; wind may affect Sweden’s long‑ball transitions

Injury Report

Japan

• Takehiro Tomiyasu (CB) — Probable, recovering from minor quad tightness
• Daichi Kamada (CM) — Questionable, ankle soreness
• Ritsu Dōan (RW) — Probable, illness recovery
• Hiroki Ito (LB) — Out, knee ligament sprain Impact: Defensive rotations are thin; Kamada’s status affects Japan’s midfield creativity.

Sweden

• Alexander Isak (ST) — Probable, minor groin discomfort
• Dejan Kulusevski (RW) — Probable, recovering from fatigue
• Victor Lindelöf (CB) — Questionable, hamstring tightness
• Emil Forsberg (AM) — Out, calf tear Impact: Sweden’s attack remains dangerous, but Forsberg’s absence removes a key chance creator.

Team Records & Tournament Context

Japan

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 1–0–0
• Goals For: 2
• Goals Against: 0
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #18
• Identity: High‑tempo possession, aggressive pressing, fluid front‑three movement

Sweden

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 1
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #23
• Identity: Structured 4‑4‑2/4‑2‑3‑1 hybrid, strong in transition, physical in duels

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Japan

• W 2–0 vs Tunisia
• W 3–1 vs Australia
• L 1–2 vs Spain
• W 2–0 vs Qatar
• D 1–1 vs Morocco Trend: Strong defensive form; consistent scoring from wide channels.

Sweden

• D 1–1 vs Netherlands
• L 0–1 vs Switzerland
• W 2–0 vs Finland
• L 1–2 vs Serbia
• D 0–0 vs Denmark Trend: Low‑scoring matches; defensive stability but inconsistent attack.

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Japan’s Press vs. Sweden’s Build‑Up

• Japan’s coordinated high press can disrupt Sweden’s slower center‑back pairing.
• Sweden may bypass pressure with long diagonals to Isak. Advantage: Japan

2. Kaoru Mitoma vs. Emil Holm (Right Side)

• Mitoma’s dribbling and acceleration are elite.
• Holm is physical but can be beaten on the turn. Advantage: Japan

3. Alexander Isak vs. Japan’s Center‑Backs

• Isak’s hold‑up play and movement between lines can trouble Japan’s backline.
• Tomiyasu’s availability is crucial. Advantage: Sweden (slightly)

4. Midfield Control: Endo & Morita vs. Olsson & Cajuste

• Japan’s double‑pivot is more technical and press‑resistant.
• Sweden’s midfield is more physical but less creative. Advantage: Japan

5. Set Pieces

• Sweden: Strong aerial presence (Isak, Lindelöf if fit)
• Japan: Organized but undersized Advantage: Sweden

Series History

• All‑time meetings: 6
• Japan wins: 2
• Sweden wins: 3
• Draws: 1
• Last meeting: Japan 1–0 Sweden (Friendly, 2016)
• First competitive meeting since 1992

Betting Trends

Japan

• 8 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 of last 8: Scored first
• 7 of last 10: Won possession battle

Sweden

• 9 of last 12: Under 2.5
• 5 straight matches: First‑half under 1.5
• 6 of last 8: Failed to score multiple goals

MATCH ODDS

Japan                                    – 115

Sweden                               + 240

Draw                                     + 255

Over 2.5 – 130                   Under 2.5 + 105

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Mercedes‑Benz Stadium, Atlanta, Georgia

Venue

Mercedes‑Benz Stadium — Atlanta, GA

• Capacity: ~71,000 (expanded for FIFA)
• Surface: Natural grass overlay
• Roof: Expected closed due to heat and humidity
• Pitch profile: Fast, true roll, favors high‑tempo possession teams like Germany

Kickoff: 3:00 PM EDT / 12:00 PM PDT

Weather Forecast (Atlanta, GA)

Even with the roof closed, outside conditions influence humidity inside the stadium.

• Temperature: 89°F (32°C)
• Humidity: 63%
• Wind: 7 mph SW
• Precipitation: 30% chance
• Impact: Humidity slightly favors Ecuador’s altitude‑adapted players, but Germany’s depth mitigates fatigue concerns

Injury Report

Ecuador

• Piero Hincapié (CB) — Probable, minor ankle soreness
• Moisés Caicedo (CM) — Probable, recovering from thigh tightness
• Enner Valencia (ST) — Questionable, knee swelling
• Ángelo Preciado (RB) — Out, hamstring tear Impact: Defensive width compromised; Caicedo’s availability is critical for Ecuador’s midfield stability.

Germany

• Jamal Musiala (AM) — Probable, recovering from illness
• Antonio Rüdiger (CB) — Questionable, groin tightness
• Kai Havertz (F) — Probable, minor foot contusion
• Leroy Sané (RW) — Out, calf strain Impact: Germany’s attack remains potent, but Rüdiger’s status affects their high line and aerial dominance.

Team Records & Tournament Context

Ecuador

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 1–0–0
• Goals For: 2
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #31
• Identity: High‑pressing 4‑3‑3, physical midfield, dangerous in transition

Germany

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 1
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #14
• Identity: Possession‑dominant, fluid attacking rotations, elite technical midfield

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Ecuador

• W 2–1 vs Curaçao
• D 1–1 vs Ivory Coast
• L 0–1 vs Uruguay
• W 2–0 vs Bolivia
• D 0–0 vs Peru Trend: Strong defensive structure; scoring remains inconsistent outside transition moments.

Germany

• D 1–1 vs Ivory Coast
• W 3–1 vs Greece
• L 0–1 vs Netherlands
• W 2–0 vs Switzerland
• D 2–2 vs Austria Trend: Mixed results but strong underlying metrics; midfield control remains elite.

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Moisés Caicedo vs. Toni Kroos / İlkay Gündoğan

• Caicedo’s ball‑winning vs. Germany’s elite tempo control
• If Caicedo is limited, Ecuador loses its midfield anchor Advantage: Germany (unless Caicedo is fully fit)

2. Ecuador’s Backline vs. Germany’s Fluid Attack

• Germany’s front three interchange constantly
• Ecuador’s CBs are strong but can be pulled out of shape Advantage: Germany

3. Wing Play: Jeremy Sarmiento vs. Joshua Kimmich

• Sarmiento’s pace can trouble Kimmich, who prefers central positioning
• Germany may adjust with a more defensive RB Advantage: Ecuador (slightly)

4. Set Pieces

• Ecuador: One of CONMEBOL’s best aerial teams
• Germany: Strong delivery but inconsistent marking Advantage: Ecuador

5. Goalkeeper Battle

• Alexander Domínguez (ECU) — Good reflexes, shaky distribution
• Manuel Neuer (GER) — Experience, command, elite sweeping Advantage: Germany

Series History

• All‑time meetings: 3
• Germany leads: 2–1–0
• Last meeting: Germany 2–0 Ecuador (Friendly, 2013)
• First competitive meeting at a FIFA World Cup since 2006 (Germany won 3–0)

Betting Trends

Ecuador

• 7 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 6 straight matches: Allowed 1 goal or fewer
• 4 of last 6: Failed to score first

Germany

• 8 of last 10: Scored in first half
• 6 of last 10: Over 2.5
• 5 of last 7: Won xG battle

MATCH ODDS

Ecuador                                + 450

Germany                             – 190

Draw                                     + 390

Over 2.5 – 160                   Under 2.5 + 130

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026

NRG Stadium, Houston, Texas

Venue

NRG Stadium — Houston, Texas

• Capacity: ~72,000
• Surface: Natural grass (World Cup temporary installation)
• Known for: Fast pitch, consistent roll, and indoor climate control when roof is closed
• Roof status: Expected closed due to heat and humidity

Kickoff: 6:00 PM CDT (Local) / 4:00 PM PDT

Weather Forecast (Houston, TX)

Even with the roof likely closed, outside conditions still matter for pre‑match warmups and pitch humidity.

• Temperature: 92°F (33°C)
• Humidity: 68%
• Wind: 8 mph SE
• Precipitation: 20% chance
• Impact: High humidity favors the deeper, more athletic squad — advantage Ivory Coast

Injury Report

Curaçao

• Leandro Bacuna (CM) — Questionable, minor groin tightness
• Rangelo Janga (ST) — Probable, recovering from ankle knock
• Jurien Gaari (RB) — Out, hamstring strain
• Depth concerns: Backline rotation is thin; defensive shape could suffer late in match

Ivory Coast

• Sebastian Haller (ST) — Probable, recovering from calf soreness
• Ibrahim Sangaré (DM) — Out, thigh injury
• Odilon Kossounou (CB) — Questionable, knee swelling
• Depth outlook: Midfield ball‑winning takes a hit without Sangaré, but attacking depth remains elite

Team Records & Tournament Context

Curaçao

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–1–0
• Goals For: 1
• Goals Against: 3
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #84
• Identity: Compact 4‑4‑2, counter‑attacking, heavy reliance on set pieces

Ivory Coast

• 2026 World Cup Group Stage Record: 0–0–1
• Goals For: 1
• Goals Against: 1
• FIFA Ranking (June 2026): #38
• Identity: Physical, athletic, vertical transitions, elite wing play

Recent Form (Last 5 Matches)

Curaçao

• L 1–3 vs Germany
• L 0–2 vs Ecuador
• W 2–1 vs Trinidad & Tobago
• D 1–1 vs Haiti
• L 0–1 vs Cape Verde Form Trend: Struggling defensively; conceding early and often

Ivory Coast

• D 1–1 vs Germany
• W 2–0 vs Cape Verde
• L 0–1 vs Morocco
• W 3–1 vs DR Congo
• D 0–0 vs South Africa Form Trend: Stable, low‑variance, strong defensive structure

Tactical & Player Matchups

1. Curaçao’s Backline vs. Ivory Coast’s Front Three

• Curaçao weakness: Slow center‑backs, vulnerable to diagonal runs
• Ivory Coast strength:
  • Nicolas Pépé (RW) — 1v1 specialist
  • Jeremie Boga (LW) — pace and cut‑inside threat
  • Haller (ST) — aerial dominance Advantage: Ivory Coast

2. Curaçao Midfield vs. Franck Kessié

• Curaçao relies on Bacuna for ball progression
• Kessié’s physicality and press resistance can tilt midfield control Advantage: Ivory Coast

3. Set Pieces

• Curaçao: Their best scoring path
• Ivory Coast: Strong aerial defenders but occasionally sloppy on second balls Advantage: Curaçao (slightly)

4. Goalkeeper Battle

• Eloy Room (CUR) — Shot‑stopper, struggles with distribution
• Yahia Fofana (CIV) — More complete profile Advantage: Ivory Coast

Series History

These nations have never met in a competitive senior international match. This is their first‑ever FIFA World Cup meeting.

Betting Trends

Curaçao

• 7 of last 10 matches: Conceded 2+ goals
• 4 straight matches: Lost xG battle
• 5 of last 7: Under 2.5

Ivory Coast

• 8 of last 10: Allowed 1 goal or fewer
• 6 of last 10: Under 2.5
• 4 of last 5 wins: Won by multiple goals

MATCH ODDS

Curacao                                + 1700

Ivory Coast                         – 650

Draw                                     + 750

Over 3.5 + 125                  Under 3.5 – 155

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Wednesday, June 24, 2026