D3-CFB Game Preview:  Wheaton (IL) Thunder (12-2) vs. DePauw Tigers (10-1)

0
26

The third round of the 2025 NCAA Division III football playoffs brings an intriguing Midwest showdown between the No. 6-seeded Wheaton (IL) Thunder (12-1, CCIW champions) and the surging DePauw Tigers (10-1, NCAC champions). Set for Saturday, December 6, 2025, at 12:00 PM CT, this matchup at Wheaton’s home field pits a high-octane offensive powerhouse against a battle-tested underdog coming off a gritty road upset. Both teams earned byes in the first round and advanced via dominant second-round wins, but Wheaton’s home-field edge and explosive attack make them the team to beat. The winner punches a ticket to the quarterfinals, eyeing a potential path to the Stagg Bowl in Allison, IA, on December 20.

Venue and Game Details

Location: Memorial Field, Wheaton, Illinois (Capacity: 4,500). This intimate, grass-surface venue on the Wheaton College campus has been a fortress for the Thunder, who posted a perfect 6-0 home record this season, outscoring opponents 280-98 (46.7-16.3 PPG). Built in 1893 and renovated in 2018, it features a scenic backdrop with campus buildings and is known for its passionate student section, the “Thunder Zone,” which creates a wall of noise despite the smaller size.

Kickoff: 12:00 PM CT (1:00 PM ET).

Broadcast/Stream: Live on ESPN+ with local radio on WETN 88.1 FM (Wheaton) and WGRE 91.5 FM (DePauw). Pre-game analysis begins at 11:00 AM CT on both networks.

Weather Forecast

Early December in suburban Chicago often means brisk, variable conditions, and models for Wheaton point to a chilly but playable afternoon favoring a run-heavy game. Based on long-range forecasts from AccuWeather and the National Weather Service (as of December 1, 2025):

High: 32°F (0°C).

Low: 22°F (-6°C).

Conditions: Partly cloudy with light winds from the north at 8-12 mph. Chance of precipitation: 20% (light flurries possible late, but no accumulation expected). Feels-like temps around 20°F could affect ball handling and deep passes, but dry grass should prevent major footing issues. Bundle up—Thunder fans’ blue-and-gold scarves will be out in force.

Injury Report

Both squads are largely intact heading into the third round, with no season-ending injuries reported post-second round. Updates from team sites and midweek press conferences (as of December 1, 2025):

Wheaton (IL) Thunder:

Out: None significant; the team avoided major hits in their 76-14 rout of Crown.

Questionable: LB Jake Goldberg (shoulder; limited in Tuesday’s practice but optimistic per coach Quincy Wright).

Probable: All key starters, including QB Ryan Beyers (full participation after a minor wrist wrap last week).

DePauw Tigers:

Out: None; the defense that limited Wisconsin-Whitewater to 23 points is fully operational.

Questionable: WR Robby Ballentine (ankle tweak from the second-round pick-six recovery; day-to-day but practiced Wednesday).

Probable: QB Scott Ballentine (cleared after throwing 2 TDs in snowy conditions vs. Whitewater) and RB Caden Whitehead (full go post-63-yard rushing effort). Coaches Wright (Wheaton) and Chris Dietz (DePauw) both highlighted depth as a strength, with backups proving reliable in recent blowouts.

Key Player Matchups

Wheaton’s explosive passing game (top-5 nationally at 285 yds/game) will test DePauw’s opportunistic secondary, while the Tigers’ balanced attack seeks to exploit gaps in the Thunder’s stout front seven. Spotlight battles:

MatchupWheaton PlayerDePauw PlayerWhy It Matters
QB vs. Pass RushRyan Beyers (Sr., QB): 2,450 pass yds, 28 TDs, 65% comp.; 450 rush yds, 5 TDsChris Green (So., DE): 12 sacks, 18 TFL, 45 tacklesBeyers’ quick release and mobility (4 TD runs in playoffs) vs. Green’s league-leading pressure (2.5 sacks in Monon Bell). If Green disrupts, DePauw could force turnovers (Tigers +7 TO margin).
RB vs. Front SevenJalen Blackmon (Jr., RB): 1,150 rush yds, 14 TDs on 165 carries (7.0 YPC)Holt Helderman (Jr., LB): 98 tackles, 9 TFL, 2 INTsBlackmon’s vision and speed (two 150+ yd games) tests Helderman’s run fits. DePauw allows 112 rush yds/game but bent vs. Whitewater’s ground game.
WR vs. SecondaryTrey Cholod (So., WR): 62 rec., 950 yds, 11 TDsSammy Miranda (Sr., CB): 4 INTs, 35 tackles, 2 PBUsCholod’s deep-threat ability (three 100+ yd games) vs. Miranda’s coverage skills (top-10 NCAC in passes defended). Wheaton’s air raid could stretch DePauw’s zone.
TE vs. LinebackerMax Snygg (Jr., TE): 35 rec., 520 yds, 6 TDsCaden Whitehead (So., LB/RB hybrid): 112 tackles, 7 TFLSnygg’s mismatch in the seam vs. Whitehead’s versatility (63 rush yds in playoffs). DePauw’s hybrid D ranks top-15 in TE coverage efficiency.

These clashes highlight Wheaton’s offensive versatility (42.1 PPG) against DePauw’s gritty defense (17.2 PPG allowed).

Recent Team Forms

Wheaton rides a 12-game win streak into the playoffs, while DePauw has won 10 straight after an early stumble, showcasing resilience in adverse conditions.

Wheaton (IL) Thunder: Dominant in the CCIW (7-0), the Thunder outscored foes 504-198 (42.1-16.5 PPG), with a playoff explosion underscoring their ceiling. Recent highlights:

Nov. 29 (2nd Rd): 76-14 W vs. Crown—Beyers: 320 pass yds/4 TDs; Blackmon: 140 rush yds/2 TDs; defense forced 5 TOs.

Nov. 15 (Reg. Finale): 45-21 W vs. North Central—Snapped rival’s streak with 400+ total yds.

Oct. 25: 38-17 W at Carthage—Bounced back from lone loss (to Mount Union) with balanced attack. Form: WWWWW (last 5); +25.6 point differential; 9-1 in one-score games.

DePauw Tigers: Undefeated in NCAC play (8-0) after a Week 2 loss to Susquehanna, the Tigers score 31.8 PPG while allowing 17.2, peaking with back-to-back road playoff wins. Recent surge:

Nov. 29 (2nd Rd): 26-23 W at #12 Wisconsin-Whitewater—Ballentine: 182 pass yds/2 TDs in snow; defense sealed with late INT.

Nov. 15 (Reg. Finale): 41-20 W vs. Wabash (Monon Bell)—Ballentine: 328 yds/4 TDs; held foes to 32 rush yds.

Nov. 1: 35-14 W at Wittenberg—Rushed for 180 yds in rain, showing adaptability.

Form: WWWWW (last 5); +14.6 point differential; 7-0 as underdogs.

Conference vs. Conference: CCIW vs. NCAC

This game contrasts the run-first, physical grind of the College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW) with the North Coast Athletic Conference’s (NCAC) balanced, adaptive style. The CCIW, ranked No. 3 nationally in D3 rankings, produced three playoff teams this year (Wheaton, North Central, #18 North Park) and emphasizes trench warfare—Wheaton’s 220 rush yds/game and top-10 scoring defense (16.5 PPG allowed) embody this. Historically, CCIW teams hold a 65-42 edge over NCAC squads since 2010, with a +12.4 average margin.

The NCAC, climbing to No. 7 in 2025 rankings after adding John Carroll, features DePauw’s pass-heavy attack (260 yds/game) and opportunistic D. The conference sent two teams to playoffs (DePauw, #15 Wooster) and shines in versatility, but trails in non-con wins (18-12 vs. CCIW’s 25-8). Expect CCIW power to clash with NCAC cunning, potentially favoring Wheaton’s home style.

Team Records

TeamOverall RecordConference RecordPF/PANational Rank (D3Football.com)
Wheaton (IL) Thunder12-17-0 (CCIW Champs)42.1 / 16.5#6 (Off: #4; Def: #10)
DePauw Tigers10-18-0 (NCAC Champs)31.8 / 17.2#15 (Off: #18; Def: #12)

Wheaton chases its first Final Four since 2017; DePauw seeks a second straight quarterfinal appearance.

Series History

These non-conference foes have limited history, meeting just twice since 2000, with Wheaton holding a slim edge (2-0). No playoff meetings, but the Thunder’s home dominance looms large:

Oct. 22, 2022: Wheaton 35-28—Beyers’ predecessor threw for 300 yds; DePauw rallied late but fell short.

Sept. 12, 2015: Wheaton 24-17—Defensive stands sealed a low-scoring affair. Wheaton is 2-0 at home vs. DePauw; average score: 29.5-22.5. DePauw’s 2025 road form (5-0) could make it competitive.

Betting Trends

Wheaton: 8-4-1 ATS in last 13 overall; 7-2 O/U at home (high-scoring affairs). Public 68% on Thunder to cover; 6-1 ATS in playoffs historically.

DePauw: 9-2 ATS as underdogs; 5-1 O/U in road games but 3-4 ATS vs. top-10 teams. Tigers 7-0 SU in last 7 but 4-3 ATS; public 55% on DePauw ML.

Head-to-Head: Limited data, but Wheaton 2-0 ATS in series; games hit over in both (avg. total: 52 pts). Trends suggest a Thunder cover but over risk in Wheaton’s offensive showcase.

Historical Betting Results (Series Games)

DateResultSpreadATS WinnerTotal (O/U)
Oct. 22, 2022Wheaton 35-28Wheaton -6Wheaton63 (Over 55)
Sept. 12, 2015Wheaton 24-17Wheaton -3.5Wheaton41 (Over 48)

Wheaton 2-0 ATS; 2-0 Over.

Final Prediction: Wheaton 31, DePauw 20

Game Odds

Wheaton (IL) Thunder                   – 7.5

DePauw Tigers                                  50.5

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odd Direct as of Friday, December 5, 2025