FBS-CFB Game Preview: Troy Trojans (1-2 vs. Buffalo Bulls (2-1)

0
98

Kickoff: 3:30 PM ET
Venue: UB Stadium, Buffalo, New York
Broadcast: ESPN+

Weather Forecast (Buffalo, NY)

Temperature: ~70°F (21°C) at kickoff

Conditions: Partly cloudy, light winds (6–9 mph)

Impact: Comfortable early fall conditions; no major weather disruptions expected.

Injury Report

Troy Trojans (Sun Belt):

QB Tucker Kilcrease (65 yards, 1 INT vs. Memphis) healthy but inconsistent.

RB Jordan Lovett (50 yards on 8 carries vs. Memphis) available.

WR Roman Mothershed (8 catches, 58 yards vs. Memphis) active.

LB “Goose” Crowder (shoulder) out indefinitely.

Buffalo Bulls (MAC):

QB Ta’Quan Roberson (318 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT vs. Kent State) healthy and starting.

RB Al-Jay Henderson (75 rushing yards, 1 TD; 8 catches vs. Kent State) available.

WR Nik McMillan (111 yards, 1 TD vs. Kent State) active.

LB Shaq Green-Thompson (hamstring) questionable.

Key Player Matchups

QB Ta’Quan Roberson (Buffalo) vs. Troy Secondary

Roberson’s dual-threat ability (318 passing yards, 63 rushing yards vs. Kent State) makes him Buffalo’s engine.

RB Al-Jay Henderson (Buffalo) vs. Troy Linebackers

Henderson’s versatility as both runner and receiver will test Troy’s defense, especially with Crowder out.

QB Tucker Kilcrease (Troy) vs. Buffalo Pass Rush

Kilcrease struggled vs. Memphis (10-of-29, 65 yards); he must improve efficiency to keep Troy competitive.

WR Roman Mothershed (Troy) vs. Buffalo Corners

Mothershed is Troy’s most reliable target; Buffalo must prevent him from moving the chains.

Recent Team Form

Troy Trojans (1–2, Sun Belt)

8/30/25: L 28–7 vs. Memphis

9/6/25: L 28–7 vs. Memphis (duplicate listing in reports, but 1–2 overall)

9/13/25: W 52–20 vs. Southern Miss (21 points in final two minutes)

Trend: Offense inconsistent but explosive in spurts; defense weakened by injuries.

Buffalo Bulls (2–1, MAC)

8/30/25: L 24–14 vs. Cincinnati

9/6/25: W 31–28 vs. Kent State

9/13/25: W 27–21 vs. FCS opponent

Trend: Balanced team, leaning on Roberson’s playmaking; defense solid but banged up.

Series History

This is the first-ever meeting between Troy and Buffalo.

Betting Trends

Buffalo:

2–1 ATS in 2025.

2 of 3 games have gone over the total.

1–1 ATS as a favorite of 6+ points.

Troy:

1–2 ATS in 2025.

1 of 3 games has gone over the total.

1–0 ATS as an underdog of 6+ points.

Head-to-Head: First meeting.

Historical Betting Results

Buffalo: Reliable ATS at home in September; 5–2 ATS in last 7 non-conference home games.

Troy: Historically strong ATS as a road underdog in non-conference play.

Sun Belt vs. MAC: Sun Belt teams cover ~55% of the time in these interconference matchups.

Game Odds

Troy Trojans                       42.5

Buffalo Bulls                      – 5

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odd Direct as of Friday, September 19, 2025

Previous articleFCS-CFB Game Preview: Lane Dragons (0-3) vs. Alabama A&M Bulldogs (2-1)
Next articleFCS-CFB Game Preview: UT Martin Skyhawks (0-3) vs. Missouri State Bears (1-2)
NCAAFB Editor
Profile: A dedicated college football analyst with a deep understanding of the sport’s tactical complexity, recruiting landscape, and conference‑wide dynamics. This columnist provides comprehensive coverage of the NCAA football season, blending film study, statistical insight, and historical context to explain how programs evolve from Week 1 through bowl season and the College Football Playoff. Background: With extensive experience covering Division I football, the columnist has contributed to national sports outlets, digital platforms, and radio segments focused on coaching trends, roster construction, and player development. A background in sports journalism and analytics supports a disciplined approach to evaluating performance, interpreting data, and tracking long‑term program trajectories across all major conferences. Signature Coverage Areas: Game previews and tactical matchups Film‑based breakdowns of offensive and defensive systems Recruiting analysis, transfer‑portal movement, and roster‑building strategy Coaching philosophies, scheme evolution, and conference‑wide trends Historical context, rivalry features, and postseason analysis Style & Approach: The writing emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and accessibility — translating complex schemes, advanced metrics, and recruiting data into insights that resonate with both long‑time college football fans and new followers of the sport. Each column reflects a commitment to balanced reporting, thoughtful evaluation, and a deep appreciation for the tradition, passion, and unpredictability that define NCAA football.