WNBA Game Preview: Connecticut Sun (6-18) vs. Phoenix Mercury (8-17)

0
5

Footprint Center, Phoenix, AZ

Tip‑off: 7:00 PM MST

Two struggling teams meet in downtown Phoenix with both desperate to stabilize their seasons. Connecticut enters with one of the league’s worst records, hampered by injuries and inconsistent offense. Phoenix has been slightly better, especially at home, but defensive lapses and roster instability have kept them below the playoff line. Both teams need this win, and the matchup features several intriguing individual battles.

Venue — Footprint Center

Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Capacity: ~17,000

Court Profile: Fast floor, strong shooting sightlines

Home Advantage: Mercury play with more pace at home; crowd energy boosts their perimeter attack.

Injury Report

Connecticut Sun

Alyssa Thomas — OUT (shoulder)

Brionna Jones — OUT (Achilles)

DiJonai Carrington — Day‑to‑day (ankle)

Ty Harris — OUT (knee)

Olivia Nelson‑Ododa — Day‑to‑day (back)

The Sun are missing their two franchise pillars (Thomas & Jones), leaving a massive void in rebounding, defense, and playmaking.

Phoenix Mercury

Diana Taurasi — Day‑to‑day (hamstring)

Brittney Griner — OUT (foot)

Sophie Cunningham — OUT (wrist)

Kahleah Copper — Day‑to‑day (hip)

Natasha Mack — OUT (knee)

Phoenix’s frontcourt is thin without Griner, but Copper’s availability is the biggest swing factor.

Team Records & Recent Form

Connecticut Sun (6–18)

Last 10: 2–8

Offensive Rating: Bottom‑three

Defensive Rating: Middle‑third

Trend: Struggling to generate offense; defense keeps them competitive but not enough to close games.

Phoenix Mercury (8–17)

Last 10: 4–6

Offensive Rating: Middle‑third

Defensive Rating: Bottom‑third

Trend: Offense improving at home; defense remains inconsistent.

Key Player Matchups

Kahleah Copper (PHX) vs. DeWanna Bonner (CON)

Copper’s explosiveness vs. Bonner’s length and veteran savvy. Edge: Copper, if healthy.

Diana Taurasi (PHX) vs. Sun Backcourt

Taurasi’s shooting and playmaking vs. a depleted Connecticut guard rotation. Edge: Taurasi, if active.

Moriah Jefferson (CON) vs. Phoenix Guards

Jefferson’s speed and shot creation are crucial for Connecticut’s offense. Edge: Jefferson, but Phoenix’s depth challenges her.

Phoenix Frontcourt vs. Sun Frontcourt

With Griner and Jones both out, interior play becomes unpredictable. Edge: Phoenix, due to better spacing and mobility.

Series History

All‑time: Mercury lead 30–26

Recent: Mercury have won 3 of the last 4

At Phoenix: Mercury lead 17–12

Trend: Phoenix’s perimeter shooting has historically given Connecticut trouble.

Betting Trends

Connecticut Sun

2–6 ATS in last 8

Under has hit in 6 of last 9

Sun average 77.1 PPG, bottom‑three

Struggle vs. teams with strong wing scoring

Phoenix Mercury

5–3 ATS in last 8 home games

Over has hit in 7 of last 10

Mercury average 85.4 PPG at home

Defense allows 88.0 PPG, bottom‑five

GAME ODDS

Connecticut Sun               163.5

Phoenix Mercury             – 4.5

Odds Courtesy of Sports Odds Direct as of Thursday, July 16, 2026

Previous articleWNBA Game Preview: Los Angeles Sparks (10-13) vs. Chicago Sky (8-16)
WNBA Editor
Profile: A dedicated WNBA analyst with a deep understanding of the league’s tactical evolution, player‑development pathways, and expanding cultural impact. This columnist provides comprehensive coverage that blends advanced metrics, film study, and league‑wide context to highlight the storylines shaping modern professional women’s basketball. Background: With extensive experience covering the WNBA and women’s basketball at multiple levels, the columnist has contributed to national sports outlets and digital platforms, offering perspective on coaching trends, roster construction, and organizational strategy. A background in sports journalism and analytics supports a disciplined approach to evaluating performance, interpreting data, and tracking team progression throughout the season. Signature Coverage Areas: Game previews and matchup analysis Film‑based breakdowns of offensive and defensive systems Player evaluation, draft analysis, and free‑agency movement Team‑building strategy, salary‑cap dynamics, and front‑office trends Historical context, league milestones, and postseason features Style & Approach: The writing emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and accessibility — translating complex schemes and statistical models into insights that resonate with both long‑time WNBA fans and new followers of the league. Each column reflects a commitment to balanced reporting, thoughtful evaluation, and a deep appreciation for the WNBA’s growth, competitiveness, and influence on the broader basketball landscape.